ZTNA vs VPN: Which Model Fits Today’s Enterprises?



As enterprises modernise their security architecture, they face an essential question: ZTNA or VPN? Which remote access security model is suitable to meet the current threat? The emergence of hybrid work has expanded the attack surface, and adversaries are targeting identity, endpoints, and gaps in network trust. Now is a good time for organisations to re-evaluate their legacy VPNs, which cannot provide security at the speed of the changing environment.

Why Traditional VPNs Fall Short

For a long time now, VPNs have been at the core of remote access solutions; however, these limitations expose organisations to unnecessary risks.
  • Implicit trust model - After the user is authenticated, they are granted access to the entire network, creating a significant opportunity for lateral movement.
  • Performance bottlenecks - By backhauling user traffic through a centralised gateway, the bandwidth consumed on the connection will reduce user productivity.
  • Poor scalability - Legacy VPN architectures cannot keep up with the level of agility that is required by globalised teams today.
  • Limited Visibility - The security team has no granular information about how users are behaving or their devices.
With today's advanced threats, these limitations have led to the security team's inability to provide a secure, manageable, and scalable solution for the VPNs they manage.

How ZTNA Delivers Stronger Remote Access Security

ZTNA approaches security differently from traditional approaches by establishing "zero trust" principles first and continuously validating everything. Some of the benefits of ZTNA are:
  • More granular, least-privileged access to your applications (and not the networks they reside on) minimises your exposure to attacks.
  • Continuous posture assessment using identity, confirming device health and use behaviour analytics are completed on an ongoing basis.
  • Scalability in the cloud is ideal for distributed enterprises and hybrid workforces.
  • Micro-segmenting your application access (and reducing lateral movement).
  • Improving user experience, as users will now connect directly to applications as opposed to using a VPN tunnel for routing to applications.
ZTNA also aligns with Cybersecurity Mesh Architecture principles, so it is an excellent strategic enhancement for most modern enterprises.

Choosing Between ZTNA vs VPN: How to Get it Right?

When you want fast, stable, and secure access for your users, there’s no better choice than ZTNA vs VPN. While VPNs can still be used for older systems, ZTNA will help prepare you for the future of work by aligning with both today's threat landscape and tomorrow's transformation requirements.

Final Summary & Next Steps

Moving from VPN to ZTNA is more than just a software update; it will fundamentally change your company's security. With Seqrite ZTNA, you can achieve Zero Trust with easy implementation of AI-based access controls, simple integration with your current system, and access to market-leading threat intelligence through Seqrite Labs!

Contact us to see how Seqrite ZTNA can secure your workers in modern hybrid environments.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How a Cybersecurity Solutions Company Protects Against Ransomware Attacks

Things to Look For in a Data Privacy Management Software

What Are ZTNA Solutions, and How Do They Secure Remote Access to Networks in India?